Postcards of the Redwood Highway
“The nation behaves well if
it treats its natural resources as assets which it must turn over to the next
generation increased, and not impaired, in value.”
Theodore Roosevelt
Today we
are driving along the Redwood Highway, in the company of Art Ray, Zan Stark and
Frank Patterson. It is the late 1920s (or thereabouts) and the towering trees
have inspired two responses among Americans. One is to be overcome with awe at
the power and majesty of nature and the other is to calculate how much cash
could be made from cutting down a single tree. Some Americans can experience
both simultaneously and not be aware of any contradiction, not the least
Theodore Roosevelt, who died in 1919, before any of these were taken. Notice
how Roosevelt chooses his words in the quote above, advocating neither the
protection nor destruction of forests but responsible management; two words
America has always struggled with when appearing together. These postcards
epitomize the schizophrenic attitude to wilderness that infected the American
psyche in the first decades of the last century. The Redwood Highway was a
place to worship nature, and it was also a theme park.
During
the period when most of these photos were taken, the USA had the best
environmental policy in the world. Every other country that had wilderness it
wanted preserved adapted the American model. But for something to be the best
in the world does not mean it has to be good, merely better than what anywhere
else has to offer. The American model, such as it was imposed at Yellowstone, had
parcels of wilderness that were not protected from development so much as
dependent upon a particular type; tourism. There was nothing inconsistent in
having thousands of tourists visiting places like Yellowstone and Yosemite and
each individual being asked to imagine they were in some pristine wilderness.
Even those two words were dubious. The ecosystems were barely given a moment’s
thought: wolves were hunted to extinction in Yellowstone by the mid-1920s and
being a national park never gave an area protection from grazing farm animals
or logging. As for pristine; it conveniently avoided any idea there had been
people living in these areas prior to the arrival of Europeans.
The dense
fernbrakes are what we expect to find in an ancient forest, but only because
we’ve been told to. Most genuinely old growth forests have been subject to
thousands of years of human use. Prior to the arrival of the Europeans, the
west coast was the most densely inhabited part of North America. We can be sure
that fire was used to control the ground cover and promote particular plants.
Thick undergrowth like this would have made hunting and movement difficult and
when we look at the historical record, it is more common to read descriptions
by Europeans remarking on how open the forests are. This photograph shows us
what the forest was like after European
intervention, when the Native Americans had been forced out of the redwood
forests and the undergrowth was allowed to run amok. Our modern idea of
wilderness as untouched and untamed is as much propaganda as the idea that
First Nations people were passive caretakers who did nothing but watch plants
grow.
The redwoods
of the Pacific coast and the Sequoia of the Sierra Nevada are different species
of the cypress family. They owe their exceptional height to two factors. One is
the competition in a densely populated forest where each tree was involved in a
race to the sunlight that over several thousand years became increasingly
distant from the rootstock. This can’t explain everything, otherwise all
forests would have enormous trees. The second factor is their locations between
the broad Pacific and the high Sierras. We don’t consider this part of the
world tropical, it’s in the wrong place and it’s too cold, but if we think in
terms of humidity, northern California rivals equatorial jungles. For trees to
reach 75 metres or 250 feet tall, they don’t need vast amounts of rain but a
steady, relentless damp.
Theodore Roosevelt
was an early supporter of the conservation of the redwood forests and was
instrumental in having the Muir Woods protected. The land put aside for the
national park belonged to a lesser-known Republican, William Kent. Like
Roosevelt, Kent wasn’t at all opposed to a timber industry but he realized that
unless some areas were given protection the likely result would be the total
destruction of redwood forest. The first steps were taken in 1908 when Roosevelt
had the Muir Woods preserved as a national monument.
I have a
theory about Roosevelt. Today he is known for three things: his environmental
policies, his pre-presidential years as an adventurer, rough rider, cowboy, and
for being the last president of the Gilded Age, when the capitalist class
showed off its largesse by building public institutions: universities, museums
and art galleries and libraries. Think of the latter two reputes and the first
takes on a new tone. Here was a man who was passionate about frontiers, the
physical ones he could explore on horseback and in canoes,, and the frontiers
of knowledge, and by the turn of the century even France and Britain were
looking to America to lead the way there. What is it to such a man then when forests
are cut down and office towers built in their place? Cut down the wilderness
and you remove the frontier, and the world has no need anymore for a man like
Roosevelt. His job is done. Preserve wilderness and he can still believe there
is a frontier.
The
redwoods are among the oldest trees on the planet, with a few getting close to
4000 years old (still falling short of some nearby bristlecone pines by a
millennium). We see that this one’s life came to a premature end in 1930. The
lumberjacks who set about cutting it down could probably tell how old it was to
within a century so when it fell they sliced off a disc and sent it on to
whoever was managing the tourist facilities. Dendrochronology is the art of
reading tree rings to understand climatic patterns. To people that can read
them, tree rings reveal a precise story of shifting weather conditions.
Although they cannot tell us who or what was living in the vicinity 500 years
ago they can provide an explanation as to why everyone packed up and moved out.
To the rest of us the best that
tree rings offer is a timeline that appears astonishing but tells us nothing.
Well, we can see here that this tree was already sturdy and mature when William
the Conqueror landed at Hastings, which needless to say is nowhere near
northern California. And height-wise it was impressive by the time Columbus
landed on an island in another ocean. As history lessons go, it’s a bit non sequitur.
Still, there’s an irony at work. You want to impress on tourists how old these
trees are but the only way you can do that is by cutting them down.
Well it's been fun. We've witnessed the beauty of nature and the banality of man looking quite comfortable together, seen things that some of our contemporary Americans would rather we hadn't and others that remind us there was a time when the choices facing us were simpler We've saved the best for last. The drive
through tree is most iconic image of the Redwood Highway. Even people who can't spell Sequoia know it's the tree you can drive through. During the 1920s and
30s there were several of these trees on the highway. Most, including the
Coolidge, have died, which somehow doesn’t sound surprising. At least three are
still in operation, and all owned privately so they come with a fee. Adams photographed plenty of redwoods
but it’s doubtful he ever photographed one of these trees – the car, Beaver and Wally Cleaver's faces pressed against the window, would have been anathema to his
purist eye – but I can’t help feeling that his view is all the more deceitful
for that. Whether he was
suggesting his view was what the Redwood forest looked like now or what it
could look like in the future, it was created in the darkroom. He was like a
good lawyer in that you had to pay attention to what he was leaving out. Zan
Stark and Art Ray weren’t that clever but if you want to know how environmental
policy worked in the 1920s and ‘30s, which is the same as wanting to know why
some aspects don’t work today, they are the photographers to look at.
LAND OF THE GIANTS |
Can there be a middle ground, where you portray both sides simultaneously? Perhaps not, because by its very position in the middle, it no longer does either.
ReplyDelete