"...among the calamities of war may
be jointly numbered the diminution of the love of truth, by the falsehoods
which interest dictates and credulity encourages."
from The Idler magazine, dated November 11, 1758,
160 years before Armistice Day.
On the little chalkboard at the front the message reads,
“Kriegsjahr 1914/15”, or “Year of the War” then something indecipherable and
what could be Eisenfeld, which would be a small town north of Frankfurt. An
expert could interpret the variety of caps and tell us more, but for the time
being it looks like a battalion or regiment has been billeted in the town. The
sign on the door at the back is for Odam camembert cheese, which obviously
makes us think they are outside a store or bar. The middle aged couple at the
back could be the owners and the two younger women their daughters or staff.
Everything so far has been self explanatory, but what of the mug of beer on the
table? Thousands of German postcards just like this one are floating
about and the mug of beer is a common element. There’s a simple explanation –
someone just ordered a beer, and as the man at the very rear left is also
holding a beer that looks straightforward and evident – but simple explanations
aren’t always satisfying. Could it have stood in for absent friends? After all,
the toast to lost comrades has been common across all armies through the
centuries, and though it is somewhat atavistic, the idea of having a glass of
beer to stand in for them is not illogical.
The two predominant images of World War 1 are the bodies in
the trenches and the fools in charge. As the centenary drew closer there was a
spot of revisionism, a few suggestions that as First Lord of the Admiralty
during the Gallipoli campaign, Churchill wasn’t quite the disaster he has been
made out to be, but even the worst leaders have their ever faithful supporters.
Here’s a postcard of Counts Häseler (on the left) and Zeppelin. The caption at
the top tells us they are the oldest commanders of the German army. This and
several others in the same series were made in 1910, when war was a certainty
though no timetable had been drawn up. Neither man had an active role in the
war, both being in their 80s, but something about this image says a lot about
the state high command. It wasn’t just that so many of the generals were old
men who should have been pensioned off, but most of them had come through the
various officer corps during an era when class distinctions were so strong they
might never exchange words with a single ordinary soldier. It was an era when
officers were gentlemen, hoped to engage in at least one legendary cavalry
charge and had no clue how to deal with irregular Sudanese, Boer or other
upstart militias out in the colonies. Look at these two. What silly hats. What pompous outfits. As for the sabres; what good would they be in the trenches?
The photo is by Alfred Kuhlewindt, an official photographer for the German High
Command and a man whose job was to make the ridiculous pass for the sublime.
There is a publisher’s stamp on this but no photographer
credited. That doesn’t matter. Variations on this image, the young frau wearing
the soldier’s cap with a (painted) horse behind her, were among the most
popular postcards sent to the soldiers at the front. Thereby hangs a tale, or an
idea at least. Wir halten durch! In
English: ‘We came by’, or ‘We stopped by’. Who is ‘we’? Well, it is the young
women of Germany, but more specifically, the young women who rode horses. In
Germany C1914 to 1918, that really meant the young women from good middle to
upper middle class families, der junge
frauen der mittelschicht (I think): well bred, wholesome, cultured, for
whom horse riding was a pleasure, like reading Goethe or going to the museum on
Sundays; in other words, the ideal German woman, she whose honour the boys in
the trenches are fighting for. Wir halten
durch! Why? To offer words of encouragement? To remind young Kurt that
trenchfoot, dysentery and good odds of a premature death were but small
sacrifices for the greater ideal? There’s a study waiting to be made of this
young frau, and her English, French, Belgian, Dutch and Russian equivalents,
because they are the same, but different in their subtle ways. You won’t find
many images of British lasses with painted horses because horse riding didn’t
have the same cultural resonance in England. Ditto the French mademoiselle, who
likely as not is holding a flag in one hand, a tray of pastries or a bottle and
wine glasses in the other.
Happy Easter, 1915. It is postmarked April 2nd
but even Germans have trouble reading the handwriting, because it is so flowery
they can’t tell if they are looking at a t, an f or a j. The message, or what
they can work out from it, seems fairly pedestrian. Someone is going to Cologne
soon and thinking warmly of the recipient. It is the image that matters in any
case, and how strange it is. The egg itself is easy to understand, not so much
a symbol of fertility as one of the family. And look at the trench the soldiers
are in. It looks more like a culvert, a neat, shallow and well constructed
channel. Did the people back home really believe the trenches looked like this?
They may have. In early 1917 disillusion with the German army was so strong
that several cities were paralysed by riots. It wasn’t just the death toll that
made people angry; it was also the discovery that they were being lied to.
Their boys weren’t winning magnificent victories, and just like the Allies,
they couldn’t retreat if they wanted to, the war being stuck in the trenches.
Despite all the evidence in the form of the war wounded wandering the streets
it took two years for that message to affect enough people that civil unrest
became possible. The day this postcard was mailed off, a German cavalry unit
was badly beaten in Poland by a Russian force but the chances were slim the
author of the postcard knew that. Only the Russian news services would have
published that information, and as every German knew, they weren’t to be
trusted. In 1915 Easter fell on Sunday April 4. This postcard was mailed on
Good Friday.
While we are on the topic of truth being ignored,
misconstrued or overlooked, here’s one the Allies may have conveniently
forgotten. On the back the message reads, in German, “Three Tonkinese soldiers
captured 5. 6. .18.” It also says where, though that isn’t clear. ‘Tonkinese’
was the common term for people from North Vietnam, but often enough anyone from
what was then French Indochina, which included Cambodia. Consider the background. The palms suggest an exotic, tropical location. Brief research
(Wikipedia) has uncovered the detail that some 92 000 Vietnamese soldiers
served in the French army on the Western Front. That’s an awful lot of people
to leave out of the standard histories, especially when you remember that
approximately 103 000 New Zealanders served. The French could argue that,
coming from the Colonies, they were part of France anyway, but perhaps France
has always been troubled by the Indochinese contribution. The history of the
Indochinese wars that began in 1946 and ended with America’s defeat in 1975,
properly begins in the First World War when the initial anti-colonial uprisings
took place. Vietnam wasn’t just sending soldiers but being taxed to support the
French effort, and when you study the expressions on these men’s faces you get
an inkling of why the King of Vietnam, Duy Tân, would leave his palace to join
the protestors in the streets in 1916. Ho Chi Minh later claimed his political
ideologies first formed during the war.
THE OTHER SIDE |
Excellent post! I was so struck by the quote you used to open with, I have to write that one down.
ReplyDeleteYou know me as Nancy S. Ellis on facebook.
cheers!